5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
Blog Article
The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, it is also a effectively-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
94 . Const. P. read more 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. If the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided because of the decision on the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
The different roles of case legislation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the best way that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale guiding their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the wider legal principles.
Permit’s deal with what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.
whether when granting promotion senior employees were viewed as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
department concerned shall give the complete set of ACRs on the concerned officer to DPC very well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears in addition to a new system is place in its place.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information being gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
3. Rule of Legislation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of regulation and ensuring that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition on the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Progress Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court listened to the matter as being a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) in the Pakistan Constitution provides first jurisdiction to the Supreme Court to take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to observe that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are completely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case legislation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held via the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--